Readmission to hospital 5 years after hysterectomy or endometrial resection in a national cohort study.

نویسندگان

  • A Clarke
  • A Judge
  • A Herbert
  • K McPherson
  • S Bridgman
  • M Maresh
  • C Overton
  • D Altman
چکیده

OBJECTIVES To investigate the readmission experience of a large national prospective cohort of women up to 5 years after undergoing either transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) or hysterectomy to assess reasons for readmission and whether TCRE can be viewed as a definitive substitute for hysterectomy. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS Data are from the VALUE/MISTLETOE prospective national cohort studies of hysterectomy and TCRE respectively. 5294 women who underwent hysterectomy for dysfunctional uterine bleeding in 1994/5 and 4032 women who underwent TCRE in 1993/4 and who responded to postal questionnaires were included. Surgeons gathered operative details. Women completed postal follow up questionnaires at 3 and 5 years after surgery asking about readmission to hospital and reasons for readmission. Adjusted proportional hazard ratios were calculated for likelihood of readmission in each category comparing types of surgery. RESULTS 41.7% of women undergoing hysterectomy and 44.6% of women undergoing TCRE experienced one or more readmissions to hospital overall within 5 years (adjusted hazard ratio for all readmissions (AHR) 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 0.95)). 12.6% of hysterectomy patients and 30.3% of TCRE patients were readmitted for gynaecological reasons (AHR 0.40 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.48)). Rates of readmission for gynaecological reasons were similar up to 6 months but were markedly reduced for hysterectomy compared with TCRE patients towards the end of the follow up period (AHR for readmission at 3-5 years 0.28 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.39)). CONCLUSIONS There are differences in the pattern of readmission to hospital after hysterectomy and TCRE for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Women undergoing a hysterectomy are less likely to be readmitted to hospital up to 5 years after their operation overall, and are significantly less likely to be readmitted for reasons related to their operation, particularly for gynaecological reasons. Hysterectomy appears to be a more definitive operation. The different options for surgery for dysfunctional uterine bleeding are not interchangeable; they represent different patterns of care. Information should be available to women and practitioners to inform choices between these options.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A randomised trial comparing endometrial resection and abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia.

OBJECTIVE To determine the advantages and disadvantages of endometrial resection and abdominal hysterectomy for the surgical treatment of women with menorrhagia. DESIGN Randomised study of two treatment groups with a minimum follow up of nine months. SETTING Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading. SUBJECTS 51 of 78 menorrhagic women without pelvic pathology who were on the waiting list for abd...

متن کامل

RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING ROLLERBALL ABLATION WITH CUTTING LOOP ENDOMETRIAL RESECTION IN THE TREATMENT OF MENORRHAGIA

In order to compare the clinical efficacy, safety, success rate and probable complications of rollerball ablation with cutting loop endometrial resection in the treatment of menorrhagia, eighty-three women in reproductive age suffering from menorrhagia who did not respond to medication were treated in a randomized study comparing cutting loop endometrial resection with hysteroscopic rollerb...

متن کامل

Long-term economic evaluation of resectoscopic endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE To assess long-term costs of resectoscopic endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy in women with menorrhagia. DESIGN Controlled cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING Multispeciality group practice. PATIENTS Sixty-four women who underwent endometrial ablation during 1992-1994 and 46 women who underwent hysterectomy during 1990-1992. To attain comp...

متن کامل

EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF PREHYSTERECTOMY CURETTAGE IN DETERMINING TUMOR TYPE IN THE PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIAL CANCER IN SHAHID MOTAHARI HOSPITAL IN URMIA, IRAN

Background & Aims: The use of curettage in the diagnosis of endometrial disorders is very widespread, and is the most common diagnostic method before performing hysterectomy. Various studies have been performed to compare the pathological results obtained from curettage with the final pathological results of hysterectomy. The results of some of these studies indicated high efficiency of curetta...

متن کامل

مقایسه قدرت Uterobrush و Pipelle در تشخیص نمونه‌های آندومتر

Abstract Background: Endometrial cancer is the most frequent cancer in the female genital system. Nowadays outpatient diagnostic procedures like pipelle and uterobrush have facilitated the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer in early stages in high-risk patients. This study has been done to compare the accuracy and tissue sufficiency of biopsy by pipelle and uterobrush. Methods: B...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Quality & safety in health care

دوره 14 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005